Abstract
Critical reflection on language and its relation to power and ideology is increasingly central to contemporary social. For those whose primary interest is around questions of class and class struggle this development might appear as a double-edged sword. This chapter focuses on the account of the work-in provided by Foster and Woolfson, and some of the archive materials on which their work is based, to look in detail at one particularly interesting episode during the work-in. It shows how the leading stewards first rebuffed and then 'expropriated' the social democratic language of 'co-operation' and 'negotiation' which was mobilised against them by the Government, the trades unions and the media in an attempt to bring the work-in to an end. The chapter explores how a focus on language or 'discourse' can continue to complement and enhance the approaches of social scientists whose primary interest remains focused on questions of class and class struggle.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | To make another world |
| Subtitle of host publication | Studies in Protest and Collective Action |
| Editors | Colin Barker, Paul Kennedy |
| Place of Publication | United Kingdom |
| Publisher | Ashgate Publishing Limited |
| Pages | 69-91 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781859723265 |
| Publication status | Published - 19 Feb 1996 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Political Advocacy
- Class
- Language
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'To concede or to contest? Language and class struggle'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Research output
- 1 Article
-
The “Tremendous Social Force” of Language: The Upper Clyde Shipbuilders Work-In and Heath’s U-Turn
Collins, C., Nov 2021, In: Scottish Labour History. 56, p. 59-76 18 p., 1.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Open AccessFile
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver