The Influence of Graft Fixation Methods on Revision Rates After Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Keyphrases

• Revision Risk 100%
• Revision Rate 100%
• Graft Fixation 100%
• Double-bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction 100%
• Cortical Suspensory Fixation 50%
• Hamstring Graft 41%
• Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction 41%
• Endobutton 33%
• Transfixation 33%
• Bone-patellar Tendon-bone Graft 33%
• Metal Screw 33%
• Low Risk 25%
• Femoral Fixation 25%
• High Risk 16%
• Relative Risk 16%
• Hazard Ratio 16%
• Femur 16%
• Intrafix 16%
• Hamstring Tendon 16%
• Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft 16%
• Decreased Risk 8%
• 2-year Follow-up 8%
• Patient Cohort 8%
• Aperture Fixation 8%
• Fixation Device 8%
• Mean Risk 8%
• Anterior Cruciate Ligament 8%
• Initial Stability 8%
• Patellar Tendon 8%
• PEEK Implants 8%
• Interference Screw Fixation 8%
• Interference Screw 8%
• Tibial Fixation 8%
• Tibia 8%
• Fixation Construct 8%

Medicine and Dentistry

• Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction 100%
• Tendon Graft 100%
• Hamstring Tendon 77%
• Anterior Cruciate Ligament 33%
• Hazard Ratio 22%
• Implant 22%
• Cohort Analysis 11%
• Tibia 11%