Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Global framework for communication of biological invasion risks

  • Lorenzo Vilizzi
  • , Vettath Suresh
  • , Daniela Giannetto
  • , Jeffrey Hill
  • , Wesley Daniel
  • , João Monteiro
  • , Lennart Edsman
  • , Hassan Elmi
  • , Ahmed Awale
  • , Elnaz Najafi-Majd
  • , Ramazan Mammadov
  • , Sapto Andriyono
  • , Djumanto
  • , Mohammad Azmai
  • , Abdulwakil Saba
  • , Belma Stroil
  • , Avdul Adrović
  • , Anna Vila-Gispert
  • , Dani Boix
  • , Oldřich Kopecký
  • Vilém Pavlů, Dragana Milošević, Danka Caković, Henrik Holbech, Kim Lundgreen, Juliane Lukas, Harald Ahnelt, Merike Linnamägi, Mehis Rohtla, David Almeida, Roberto Mendoza, Allan Gilles Jr., Richard Pavia Jr., Elisabeth Knudsen, Leivur Hansen, Philippe Goulletquer, Amelia Curd, Ivan Špelić, Jón Einar Jónsson, Höskuldur Thráinsson, Angela Boggero, Mihails Pupins, Artūrs Škute, Lukas Petrulaitis, Ilona Jukonienė, Gábor Herczeg, Árpád Ferincz, Hugo Verreycken, Rob Leuven, Martin Malmstrøm, Gaute Velle, Trobjon Makhkamov, Akramjon Yuldashev, Dariusz Pietraszewski, Lidia Marszał, João Canning-Clode, Mariele De Camargo, Cristina Preda, Daniyar Memedemin, Rigers Bakiu, Silvia Bakiu, Kristína Švolíková, Barbora Števove, Luka Duniš, Petra Kristan, Predrag Simonović, Radoslav Dekić, Riikka Puntila-Dodd, Miia Jauni, Karin Olsson, Kieu Ta, Thuyet Bui, Baran Yoğurtçuoğlu, Sevan Ağdamar, Bahadir Yuldashov, Peyzulla Khydyrov, Leonidas Vardakas, Nicholas Koutsikos, Costas Perdikaris, Dzmitry Lukashanets, Oleg Borodin, Eliza Uzunova, Dimitriy Dashinov, Georgii Lazkov, Myskalai Ganybaeva, Daniya Ualiyeva, Raushan Zharmukhametova, Milica Ristovska, Aleksandra Gjorgjievska, Burenbaatar Ganbaatar, Solongo Khadbaatar, Vadim Panov, Oleh Marenkov, Nurali Saidov, Mekhrovar Okhonniyozov, Yuriy Kvach, Volodymyr Yuryshynets, Marine Arakelyan, Hasmik Khachatryan, Levan Mumladze, Bella Japoshvili, Renanel Pickholtz, Tal Gavriel, Usman Atique, Muhammad Altaf, Sonia Iqbal, Zainab Al-Wazzan, Sahar Chebaane, Mohammad Hamdard, Abdul Osmani, Seyed Moghaddas, Jamileh Javidpour, Mariyam Nashath, Faruhana Abdullah, Hari Sharma, Bharat Shrestha, Vandana Vibhakaran, Shams Galib, Md. Abdul Khan, Udaya Epa, Nadiya Cassim, Mahanama De Zoysa, Ratcha Chaichana, Kamalaporn Kanongdate, Nyein Chan, La Minn Ko, Jigdrel Dorji, Chhimi Dorji, Khamla Inkhavilay, Chanhvilay Somvongsa, Kim Soben, Yutha Nida, Yohannes Tesfay, Bikila Dullo, Chulhong Oh, Youngjun Park, Shan Li, Hui Wei, Akihiko Koyama, Atsuhiko Isobe, Marina Piria

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Biological invasions, driven by the spread of non-native species, have become a critical global issue because of their far-reaching ecological and socioeconomic impacts. Effective communication of the risks of biological invasions is essential for implementing robust policy and legislation and gaining public support for conservation efforts. However, current policies often suffer from fragmentation and ineffectiveness, largely due to inadequate risk communication and complex multilevel governance. To address this challenge, we develop a global framework designed to enhance clearer communication about biological invasion risks. The framework contextualizes key terms across three domains in invasion science: species invasiveness, risk analysis, and decision support tools. Using both diffusion- of-English and ecology-of-language paradigms, and following a three-step process involving preliminary consensus, AI querying, and ground-truthing with final consensus, we validate the framework in 70 non-English languages which, together with English, have official status in at least one country and collectively cover all 195 countries worldwide. Our findings reveal that while terminology for risk analysis is well established, terminology for species invasiveness and, especially, for decision support tools remains underdeveloped in many languages, hindering effective communication and policy implementation. Our framework underscores the importance of cultural and political neutrality. By promoting clearer risk communication among scientists, policymakers, and the public globally, we aim to reduce policy fragmentation and foster enhanced collaboration in risk mitigation. We recommend expanding multilingual decision support tools to include the full risk analysis process: risk identification, risk assessment, and risk management. This will support intergovernmental mitigation efforts and promote a unified global response to biological invasions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-33
Number of pages33
JournalManagement of Biological Invasions
Volume17
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 15 - Life on Land
    SDG 15 Life on Land

Keywords

  • citizen science
  • decision support tools
  • multi-level governance
  • risk analysis
  • species invasiveness
  • validation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Global framework for communication of biological invasion risks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this