Coxsackie B 1 virus-induced changes in cell membrane-associated functions are not responsible for altered sensitivity to bacterial invasiveness

K. Modalsli, G. Bukholm, S.O. Mikalsen, M. Degré

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To analyze the possible mechanisms by which coxsackie B1 virus infection affects the invasiveness of Shigella flexneri, we have studied the influence of intracellular levels of Na+ and K+, ATPase activity, cytoplasmic membrane potential, cAMP level and cell communication through gap junctions. 3h after adsorption of viable or UV-inactivated coxsackie B1 virus the Na(+)-K+ gradient of the cell collapsed, ATPase activity decreased, the cytoplasmic membranic potential-dependent tetraphosphonium ion uptake were reduced. No changes in cAMP or intercellular cell communication were observed. S. flexneri invasiveness in HEp-2 cell pretreated with viable or UV-inactivated coxsackie B 1 virus was enhanced, but bacterial invasiveness was unchanged in K(+)-depleted HEp-2 cells, cell cultures with high intracellular Na+ content or ouabain pre-treated cells compared to control cells. We found no correlation between the enhanced bacterial invasiveness in the early phase of coxsackie B 1 virus infection in HEp-2 cell cultures and intracellular K+ depletion, high intracellular Na+ content, inhibited Na(+)-K+ ATPase activity or membranic depolarization.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)321-332
JournalArchives of Virology. Official Journal of the Virology Division of the International Union of Microbiological Societies
Volume124
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1992
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Coxsackie B1 virus
  • membrane potential
  • Shigella flexneri
  • Cell culture
  • gap junctional intercellular communication

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Coxsackie B 1 virus-induced changes in cell membrane-associated functions are not responsible for altered sensitivity to bacterial invasiveness'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this