Abstract
In most experimental studies on liquefaction, cyclic loadings are applied on specimens with various initial conditions. However, few studies compared cyclic test results with monotonic results under the same initial conditions. The relation between monotonic tests and cyclic tests is crucial for understanding liquefaction mechanics and liquefaction resistance. This work compares the stress paths of a monotonic test with those of a cyclic test under the same initial conditions, and concluded that the stress path of monotonic tests envelops the stress path of cyclic tests under the same initial conditions. In addition, a new parameter, Level of Liquefaction Index (LI) is proposed to evaluate the liquefaction resistance of specimens under various initial conditions, and a linear relationship between LI and number of cycles at failure is found.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 153-156 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering |
| Volume | 101 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Oct 2017 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
Keywords
- cyclic test
- stress path
- cyclic loading
- Liquefaction Index
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Correlations between the stress paths of a monotonic test and a cyclic test under the same initial conditions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver