Description
This is a paper which I presented to the staff and students of the Centre for Research on Activity, Development and Learning at the University of Helsinki when I spent time there as a visiting researcher in September 2009. The paper presented a carefully argued appeal to researchers in the tradition of Cultural Historical Activity Theory to reject Critical Discourse Analysis as a basis for their engagement with language and social change, and instead to focus on, and to develop, the tools and resources which are to be found in the CHAT tradition itself.Period | 22 Sept 2009 |
---|---|
Held at | University of Helsinki, Finland |
Degree of Recognition | International |
Documents & Links
- University of Helsinki 2009 Abstract 2 thurs 17thc
File: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document, 44.2 KB
Type: Text
Related content
-
Research output
-
Discourse in cultural-historical perspective: Critical discourse analysis, CHAT, and the study of social change
Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review
-
Political Analysis Versus Critical Discourse Analysis in the Treatment of Ideology: Some Implications for the Study of Communication
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
-
Analysis of Discourse as "a Form of History Writing": A Critique of Critical Discourse Analysis and an Illustration of a Cultural-Historical Alternative
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
-
Bodies of meaning: Studies on language, labour and liberation David McNally
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
-
The “Tremendous Social Force” of Language: The Upper Clyde Shipbuilders Work-In and Heath’s U-Turn
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
-
Activities
-
University of Helsinki
Activity: Visiting an external institution › Visiting an external academic institution